Norfolk Daily News
Norfolk Daily News Norfolk Daily News - Norfolk, NE
Submissions | ePaper | Subscribe | Panther Project | Twitter | Facebook | En Espanol | Contact Us
Northeast Nebraska's Most Reliable News Source
Norfolk Daily News | Norfolk, NE
Ag

The Lives of Others

03/04/09 | by Lindy Borer [mail] | Categories: Where Mom is Always Right

The Lives of Others

The previous issue of National Review put forth a list of the top 25 conservative movies; the number one pick was a 2006 German film called “The Lives of Others.” I was at the rental store on Saturday, happened to look over and see it there on the shelf. Happy coincidence, no? I nabbed it.

More:

Well, there’s a reason it was their top pick. To call it awesome doesn’t suffice; it is perhaps one of the best films championing freedom and exposing the horrors of government oppression I’ve ever seen. It is even better because it’s based upon very recent history, and for some reason, (?), it seems quite timely now, as our nation continues its own headlong careen toward socialism and new era of big government.

The film takes place in 1984 in still-Communist East Germany, and focuses on the Stasi’s surveillance of the German citizenry. It is shocking to really contemplate the lengths to which the State went to “know everything” and to control everything that the oppressed people of the GDR thought, said, read, and experienced, all in order to remain in power. Go here to read more about the plot. Go here to see the trailer. The film and the actors are all superb in their understatement, which makes it all the more compelling.

I want everyone to see this movie. If you happen to have liberal tendencies (hey, it’s okay, we’re all works in progress) you, too, would benefit from seeing why thousands of conservatives just like me rant against the unchecked growth of government and cringe when we keep discovering the predilections of our current president and his statist liberal beliefs. It’s downright scary. The push to reinstitute the so-called Fairness Doctrine (or something like it) by liberals is the first step toward stripping us of our first amendment rights and becoming another step closer to Communist East Germany, with its totalitarian regime that monitored and decided the news and even entertainment that its citizenry heard.

I strive not to be an alarmist. I. Hate. That. But, just so you all know, I’m now officially alarmed. In fact, I’ve now reached the conclusion that it’s far past the time to be alarmed. Barack Obama is doing his very best to take away our freedoms. Period. The Political Housewyf, my blogging companion and One Smart Woman, has more on this. Read her latest post about natural slaves and how some people will forfeit their freedoms to a government full of promises. People, the government is supposed to fear us, not the other way around. Our country was founded upon the notion of limited government, by the people, for the people. We loan our rights to the government for protection of those rights, and that’s it.

So, do me a favor and rent this film. Watch it as a reminder of the greatness of liberty. You won’t be disappointed.

government

9 comments

Comment from: Lynn [Visitor]
Okay, Lindy, based on your recommendation, I will rent this movie...and let you know what I think...THANK YOU!

Have a wonderful day!
03/04/09 @ 15:57
Comment from: From a Liberal [Visitor]
For someone who hates to be alarmist, this sure is an alarmist post.

And for someone who is a liberal, I'll rent this movie.

But, just so you know, under the Bush regime, the government grew at a faster pace than at any other time in history. What Bush did to undermine our freedoms far surpasses what is going on now.

If you don't believe me, just do a little research. Try starting with the Patriot Act.
03/04/09 @ 20:57
Comment from: From a Conservative [Visitor]
Ok, I'm a conservative that has an extremely difficult time understanding the liberal mindset. It makes no sense to me, but I try to be fair to it and give it the benefit of doubt. I am not going to defend Bush or Obama, both have made mistakes.

I am curious "From a Liberal" how has the Patriot Act honestly effected your life in a negative way? (Other than possibly protecting you??) Any negative aspects of the Patriot Act has had no effect on me or anyone I know.
03/04/09 @ 23:59
Comment from: Shipdit [Visitor]
The loss of freedom is never a protection. The recently released memos from the Department of Justice are horrific and terrifying; coupled with the wiretapping of journalists and news organizations, we were staring down the very-real prospect of being led by a dictator who ruled by fearmongering.

Just a guess here Conservative, but maybe you're a white person in the Midwest? That would be why the Patriot Act didn't affect you.
03/05/09 @ 13:02
Comment from: Tom Richey - NDN Gatekeeper [Member] · http://www.norfolkdailynews.com
maybe you're a white person in the Midwest?


Irrelevance does have its benefits, yes.
03/05/09 @ 14:53
Comment from: From a Conservative [Visitor]
Shipdit, loss of freedoms, hmmm, maybe you should research President Roosevelt during WW2, and see what a democrat is capable of when it comes to squashing freedoms.
03/05/09 @ 18:34
Comment from: Shipdit [Visitor]
Conservative,
Democrat or Republican president -- a moot point when it comes to oppression. Loss of freedom is loss of freedom. No one said that the political party mattered.

And just because mistakes were made in the past (as with Roosevelt), does that make it okay to repeat them? Because Bush was a Republican and said he loved God, does that mean he was right in doing what he did? Democrats have been repetedly lambasted for drudging up Bush's recent history, but bringing up Roosevelt -- hilarious!
03/06/09 @ 10:15
Comment from: Tipper [Visitor]
So far, Ohama has establised priorities.
1. Kill the unborn and most helpless
2. Spend money
3. Raise taxes
4. Spend more money
5. Blame the previous administration

I'm glad this is change we can believe in.
03/06/09 @ 18:09
Comment from: Lindy [Visitor]
For what it's worth, President Obama is keeping a lot of things the same as President Bush.

On warrantless wiretapping, Obama has adopted a legal position identical to, if not more aggressive than, the Bush position. Here's the Wall street Journal article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123638765474658467.html

Obama not only did NOT get rid of renditions (which I believe Hollywood made a movie out of) but EXPANDED them.

On detainees held without charges, Obama is maintaining the Bush administration positions as well. From CNN: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/02/21/obama-keeps-bush-view-on-afghan-detainees/

A case of cognitive dissonance, perhaps?

If Obama is keeping some Bush administration positions relating to our national security, I'm glad of it.

My concerns stem mainly from his penchant for sounding like Karl Marx and Hugo Chavez. Wiretapping? That's only a drop in the bucket compared to what the people of Venezuela face under Chavez. I simply prefer that the USA remain faithful to our roots of liberty and self-determination, something that socialism can't accomodate, and never has.
03/07/09 @ 14:46

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
Type the number 8 in the box below.
antispam test

Search

September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 14

XML Feeds

blogsoft

© 2009 Norfolk Daily News. All rights reserved
Norfolk Daily News • 525 Norfolk Avenue/ P.O. Box 977 • Norfolk, Nebraska 68701
(402) 371-1020 or toll free (877) 371-1020 Fax: (402) 371-5802
Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Webmaster@norfolkdailynews.com
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Click here for more information